Experience. Commitment. Results.

Michigan Law

Legal News

Michigan PIP Benefits Available Despite Policy Exclusion

The Michigan Court of Appeals recently published an opinion which arose from a claim under the Michigan No-Fault Act. A motor vehicle accident took place between vehicles driven by Plaintiff Muzafer Isovska and Defendant Leana Fitspatrick. The issue was which of the two (2) auto insurance policies covering the Plaintiff and her daughter provided coverage.

Read More
Dean Underwood
Questions of Fact Exist; Wrongful Death Case Goes to Trial

Plaintiff Estate brought a wrongful death claim against Defendant alleging negligence. The Defendant moved for summary disposition. Summary disposition was granted after the Trial Judge determined that the decedent was more than 50% at fault and that Defendant was presented with a sudden emergency. The Court of Appeals reversed the summary disposition and sent the case back for trial.

Read More
Peter A. Angelas, Esq.
Is Insurance Bad Faith Coming to Michigan?

We have heard the horror stories coming out of states like Florida and California arising from “bad faith” claims against insurance companies. A bad faith claim occurs when an insurance company refuses an opportunity to settle a case within an insured’s policy limits, goes to trial on the case, and a judgment more than the available policy limits is entered against the insured. 

Read More
Peter A. Angelas, Esq.
Condo Associations Beware: Co-Owners Can Sue You

A recent unpublished decision by the Michigan Court of Appeals ruled that property owners may pursue a premises liability claim against their own condominium associations for injuries suffered in common areas. The subject-case involved a condo owner who slipped and fell on an icy sidewalk outside his unit, resulting in injuries to the condo owner.

Read More
Peter A. Angelas, Esq.
Artificial Intelligence and the Law: Attorneys Beware!!

Recently the United States District, Eastern District, Southern Division (Detroit, Michigan) issued a consolidated Opinion and Order imposing monetary sanctions against counsel for using AI-generated false citations. The Court identified a series of citations in the Plaintiff’s responsive briefings that appeared to be false and AI-generated. The Court noted the citations in question contained real case names, but with fake quotes or explanatory parentheticals that did not reflect the holdings of the cases cited. As a result, Plaintiff’s counsel was ordered to show cause why counsel should not be sanctioned.

Read More
Peter Angelas